{"id":"lambert-2005-white-oak-dbh-h-foliage","source":{"id":"lambert-2005","citation":"Lambert, M.-C., Ung, C.-H., Raulier, F. (2005). Canadian national tree aboveground biomass equations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35(8), 1996–2018.","title":"Canadian national tree aboveground biomass equations","authors":["Lambert, M.-C.","Ung, C.-H.","Raulier, F."],"year":2005,"venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","doi":"10.1139/x05-112","url":"https://doi.org/10.1139/x05-112","read_url":"https://www.esf.edu/quest/documents/Lambertetal.2005.Canadatreebiomass.pdf","access":"paywalled","checked_at":"2026-11-03","status":"current","notes":"All 33 species are entered, each with total aboveground, stem (wood + bark), branch and foliage equations, for both the dbh-only set (Table 3) and the dbh + height set (Table 4). The paper's hardwood, softwood and all-species equations are not entered: they are meant for species outside the 33, and this library shows pooled fits only on the pages of species they name. Ung, Bernier & Guo (2008, CJFR 38:1123–1132, doi:10.1139/X07-224) re-estimated parameters for six species after adding British Columbia data and added eight BC species; no legal open copy of that paper was found (NRCan's repository lists it without a file), so Lambert 2005 parameters are used here."},"name":"Canadian national equation, white oak, dbh and height (foliage; Table 4)","output":{"quantity":"foliage_biomass"},"expression":"0.0053 * D^1.2822 * H^1.1323","published":{"expression":"0.0053 * dbh^1.2822 * H^1.1323","units":{"dbh":"cm","H":"m"},"variables":{"dbh":"D"},"output_unit":"kg"},"taxon":{"level":"species","name":"Quercus alba","family":"Fagaceae","group":"broadleaf"},"region":{"scope":"regional","countries":["CA"],"place":"Ontario, Canada (ENFOR archival data, early 1980s)","biomes":["temperate"]},"fit":{"n_trees":61,"dbh_min_cm":2.2,"dbh_max_cm":74.3,"h_min_m":2.8,"h_max_m":21.5,"r2":0.89,"method":"Nonlinear seemingly unrelated regression with weight functions; additivity constrained so compartments sum to total"},"evidence":[{"field":"expression","quote":"y foliage = β foliage1D βfoliage2Hβfoliage3 + efoliage","locator":"Eq. 3"},{"field":"expression","quote":"bfoliage1 0.0053","locator":"Table 4, White oak"},{"field":"expression","quote":"bfoliage2 1.2822","locator":"Table 4, White oak"},{"field":"expression","quote":"bfoliage3 1.1323","locator":"Table 4, White oak"},{"field":"fit.n_trees","quote":"White oak               61     23.9±2.1     11.5±0.6     325.4±63.1","locator":"Table 2 (No. of trees)"},{"field":"fit.dbh_min_cm","quote":"(2.2;74.3)   (2.8;21.5)    (1.3;2385.5)","locator":"Table 2, White oak (ranges of dbh, height, total biomass)"},{"field":"fit.r2","quote":"Foliage 0.0003 0.86 3.9 3.14 0.0015 0.89 3.4 2.44","locator":"Table 5, White oak (AdjRSq in the dbh- and height-based set, second block)"}],"check":[{"inputs":{"D":20,"H":15},"expected":5.2984,"origin":"computed","note":"computed from the published form at dbh = 20 cm, H = 15 m"}],"verification":"original_read","checked_at":"2026-11-03","notes":"Foliage is leaves and twigs. r2 is the adjusted R² (AdjRSq) of this compartment in Table 5. Fitted on the original scale (weighted nonlinear seemingly unrelated regression), so there is no back-transform correction. Dead branches, cones and fruits are not part of aboveground biomass in this work (Materials). Stand type was not always recorded. Ung, Bernier & Guo (2008) later revised parameters for some species with British Columbia data; not used here."}