# Acer saccharum

Sapindaceae. 3 equations apply. Each output lists them most specific first: fitted on this species, on a variety of it, pooled fits that included it, then its genus and family. Within each step, equations the authors advised against go last, then those read from compilations; more trees come first. The order shows how specific the evidence is, not which equation predicts best.

## Aboveground biomass

1. Lambert et al. 2005 (this species): Fitted on this species; 235 trees; DBH 2–57.8 cm; Read from the original paper.
   - [Canadian national equation, sugar maple, dbh only (sum of wood, bark, branches, foliage; Table 3)](https://treeallometry.org/equations/lambert-2005-sugar-maple/), Lambert et al. 2005: Acer saccharum, Canada; inputs DBH; DBH 2–57.8 cm; 235 trees.

## Foliage biomass

1. Ter-Mikaelian & Lautenschlager 2001 (this species): Fitted on this species; 10–12 trees; DBH 20.5–63.9 cm; Read from the original paper.
   - [Sugar maple leaf biomass from DBH, unmanaged stand](https://treeallometry.org/equations/ter-mikaelian-2001-unmanaged/), Ter-Mikaelian & Lautenschlager 2001: Acer saccharum, Canada; inputs DBH; DBH 21.3–58.5 cm; 12 trees.
   - [Sugar maple leaf biomass from DBH, managed stand (sugar bush)](https://treeallometry.org/equations/ter-mikaelian-2001-managed/), Ter-Mikaelian & Lautenschlager 2001: Acer saccharum, Canada; inputs DBH; DBH 20.5–63.9 cm; 10 trees.
